Sunday, March 20, 2011

Books are Weapons in the War of Ideas

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all."
—Oscar Wilde
  
     Amen, Mr. Wilde. No matter how an idea is expressed, through words, actions, thoughts, or literature, there will always be that one someone against it making the idea "dangerous." If no feedback or constructive criticism is given in return, how is it worthy of "being called an idea at all"? Ideas provoke thought. Thought differs based on individual beliefs. Individual beliefs create criticism. I'd feel honored if any of my ideas made it to the news because of its controversy. Not for the fame or the reputation but for the fact that people are reading, thinking, and sharing.
     Something worse than storing ideas internally in fear of an uproar is sharing them and then getting them rejected and censored from the public. Your brain is being suppressed because it's being considered politically and/or morally unacceptable under whose conditions? Judgmental, fault-finding officials who work under the law yet deny freedom of speech? That's just wrong.
     I think I speak for everyone when I say that no one enjoys having their works censored, no matter who you are or what you do. Imagine you're an author just surfing the net one day and you come across a big news story about how your book has just been banned from many organizations as well as schools and libraries because of obscene language. well, if it offends you so much put the book down...simple as that. I don't think officials or school boards need to go so far as to legit restrict certain students or the public from reading it.
     Censorship really provides no benefits. What good can come from it? Is it to protect the innocent minds of our generation? Because I'd say you're too late. If you restrict someone from doing something, chances are, it will make them want to do it even more. Probably more than if you haven't even laid that rule down in the first place. It's this mindset that rules are there to be broken.
     I found this comic strip from Calvin and Hobbes which relates (in a way) to broken rules. Although ironically, the kid is setting the rules down and the mother is breaking them. Use your imagination.

     So, if you restrict someone's eyes from reading or watching something, it's likely they will have an urge to find out why was it censored in the first place. Censorship follows up with curiosity.

"No man and no force can put thought in a concentration camp forever."
—Franklin D. Roosevelt

2 comments:

  1. Great connection to a classic comic strip. I think I've read most of Watterson's comics, at some point in my life. Some writers write to make money, and others to redefine social boundaries. I think Vonnegut was of the latter ilk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the whole thing below the comic the most! (I say the most because the arguments above were good too) The thought that curiousity gets the better of everyone at some point is really striking and I think that is going to continue even more after something's been banned. I totally agree with you! is what I'm trying to say :P

    ReplyDelete